lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAEkrx0P5LFj1r6a@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 18:56:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the gpio-intel tree

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:44:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in the gpio-brgl tree as different commits
> (but the same patches):
> 
>   8f4543e980ff ("gpio: ich: use new line value setter callbacks")
>   b7a49fd57be3 ("gpio: graniterapids: use new line value setter callbacks")
> 
> These are commits
> 
>   69e230a0a288 ("gpio: ich: use new line value setter callbacks")
>   04eaa41eb8eb ("gpio: graniterapids: use new line value setter callbacks")
> 
> in the gpio-bgrl tree.

I expect that gpio-bgrl should drop these. Bart?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ