[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAEoq6t8Tnts1eFY@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 19:13:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, DanieleCleri@...on.eu,
GaryWang@...on.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] pinctrl: core: add
devm_pinctrl_register_mappings()
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 04:08:10PM +0200, Thomas Richard wrote:
> Using devm_pinctrl_register_mappings(), the core can automatically
> unregister pinctrl mappings.
...
> +int devm_pinctrl_register_mappings(struct device *dev,
> + const struct pinctrl_map *maps,
> + unsigned int num_maps)
> +{
> + const struct pinctrl_map **ptr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ptr = devres_alloc(devm_pinctrl_unregister_mappings, sizeof(*ptr),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ptr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = pinctrl_register_mappings(maps, num_maps);
> + if (!ret) {
> + *ptr = maps;
> + devres_add(dev, ptr);
> + } else {
> + devres_free(ptr);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
Why not devm_add_action_or_reset()?
> +}
...
> extern int pinctrl_register_mappings(const struct pinctrl_map *map,
> unsigned int num_maps);
> +extern int devm_pinctrl_register_mappings(struct device *dev,
> + const struct pinctrl_map *map,
> + unsigned int num_maps);
No extern, please. Perhaps a clean up patch to remove existing ones?
> extern void pinctrl_unregister_mappings(const struct pinctrl_map *map);
> extern void pinctrl_provide_dummies(void);
...
Test robot wants you to add a forward declaration
struct device;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists