[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAEz2ZD0Ipd1Xuy6@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:01:13 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Cosmin Tanislav <cosmin.tanislav@...log.com>,
Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@...il.com>,
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com>,
Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>,
Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] iio: more timestamp alignment
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:52:32AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> Wile reviewing [1], I noticed a few more cases where we can use
> aligned_s64 or need __aligned(8) on data structures used with
> iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp().
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20250413103443.2420727-1-jic23@kernel.org/
Link: URL [1] :-)
This will help to maintainer with b4 as it manages tags.
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
for non-commented patches.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists