[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ff6e3be-6193-4977-977b-24de89c09153@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:16:53 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá
<nuno.sa@...log.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Cosmin Tanislav <cosmin.tanislav@...log.com>,
Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@...il.com>,
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com>,
Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>, Petre Rodan
<petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] iio: more timestamp alignment
On 4/17/25 12:01 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:52:32AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
>> Wile reviewing [1], I noticed a few more cases where we can use
>> aligned_s64 or need __aligned(8) on data structures used with
>> iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp().
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20250413103443.2420727-1-jic23@kernel.org/
>
>
> Link: URL [1] :-)
>
> This will help to maintainer with b4 as it manages tags.
In this case, I don't want b4 to add this Link: to all patches, it is just
context for the cover letter and not so useful long-term.
>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
> for non-commented patches.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists