[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8578fcea4ae682e8bb8b60b21df3c27d757b019c.camel@posteo.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:26:57 +0000
From: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@...teo.net>
To: Gabriel Shahrouzi <gshahrouzi@...il.com>
Cc: skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: frequency:: Remove unused parameter from data
documentation
On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 13:17 -0400, Gabriel Shahrouzi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:57 AM Charalampos Mitrodimas
> <charmitro@...teo.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 15:53 +0000, Charalampos Mitrodimas wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 10:32 -0400, Gabriel Shahrouzi wrote:
> > > > The AD9832 driver uses the Common Clock Framework (CCF) to
> > > > obtain
> > > > the
> > > > master clock (MCLK) frequency rather than relying on a
> > > > frequency
> > > > value
> > > > passed from platform data.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Shahrouzi <gshahrouzi@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.h | 1 -
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.h
> > > > b/drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.h
> > > > index 98dfbd9289ab8..d0d840edb8d27 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.h
> > > > @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > * struct ad9832_platform_data - platform specific information
> > > > - * @mclk: master clock in Hz
> > >
> > > Hi Gabriel,
> > >
> > > This seems to be a leftover from
> > > 566564e80b0ed23ffa4c40f7ad4224bf3327053a ("staging: iio: ad9832:
> > > use
> > > clock framework for clock reference")
> Ah ok. I will include this in the body as a reference. I guess for
> small clean up patches like this, they would have been most likely to
> be included in a larger patch that covered other changes but
> forgotten. In this case, should they be referenced?
Yes, you can just have a reference to it on your v2 (if a v2 is
needed).
> >
> > That said, a Fixes: tag might be helpful?
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > * @freq0: power up freq0 tuning word in Hz
> > > > * @freq1: power up freq1 tuning word in Hz
> > > > * @phase0: power up phase0 value [0..4095]
> > > > correlates
> > > > with 0..2PI
> > >
> > >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists