linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Add test for attaching uprobe with long event names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250417014848.59321-3-yangfeng59949@163.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:48:47 +0800
From: Feng Yang <yangfeng59949@....com>
To: ast@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	eddyz87@...il.com,
	song@...nel.org,
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
	john.fastabend@...il.com,
	kpsingh@...nel.org,
	sdf@...ichev.me,
	haoluo@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org,
	hengqi.chen@...il.com,
	olsajiri@...il.com
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Add test for attaching uprobe with long event names

From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@...inos.cn>

This test verifies that attaching uprobe/uretprobe with long event names
does not trigger EINVAL errors.

Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@...inos.cn>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c   | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
index 329c7862b52d..9b7f36f39c32 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
@@ -122,6 +122,52 @@ static void test_attach_probe_manual(enum probe_attach_mode attach_mode)
 	test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel);
 }
 
+/* attach uprobe/uretprobe long event name testings */
+static void test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name(void)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_opts, uprobe_opts);
+	struct bpf_link *uprobe_link, *uretprobe_link;
+	struct test_attach_probe_manual *skel;
+	ssize_t uprobe_offset;
+	char path[PATH_MAX] = {0};
+
+	skel = test_attach_probe_manual__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	uprobe_offset = get_uprobe_offset(&trigger_func);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(uprobe_offset, 0, "uprobe_offset"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(readlink("/proc/self/exe", path, PATH_MAX - 1), 0, "readlink"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* manual-attach uprobe/uretprobe */
+	uprobe_opts.attach_mode = PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_LEGACY;
+	uprobe_opts.ref_ctr_offset = 0;
+	uprobe_opts.retprobe = false;
+	uprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_uprobe,
+						      0 /* self pid */,
+						      path,
+						      uprobe_offset,
+						      &uprobe_opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(uprobe_link, "attach_uprobe_long_event_name"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	skel->links.handle_uprobe = uprobe_link;
+
+	uprobe_opts.retprobe = true;
+	uretprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_uretprobe,
+							 -1 /* any pid */,
+							 path,
+							 uprobe_offset, &uprobe_opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(uretprobe_link, "attach_uretprobe_long_event_name"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	skel->links.handle_uretprobe = uretprobe_link;
+
+cleanup:
+	test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 static void test_attach_probe_auto(struct test_attach_probe *skel)
 {
 	struct bpf_link *uprobe_err_link;
@@ -323,6 +369,9 @@ void test_attach_probe(void)
 	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe-ref_ctr"))
 		test_uprobe_ref_ctr(skel);
 
+	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe-long_name"))
+		test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name();
+
 cleanup:
 	test_attach_probe__destroy(skel);
 	ASSERT_EQ(uprobe_ref_ctr, 0, "uprobe_ref_ctr_cleanup");
-- 
2.43.0