[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d16c046a5c9e1ee83f1013951d77d9376d8fb64.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:14:16 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>, "djwong@...nel.org"
<djwong@...nel.org>, "brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: "jack@...e.com" <jack@...e.com>, "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "dsterba@...e.cz" <dsterba@...e.cz>,
"sandeen@...hat.com"
<sandeen@...hat.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org"
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk"
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, "willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"josef@...icpanda.com"
<josef@...icpanda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfs{plus}: add deprecation warning
Hi Slava,
On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 18:10 +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> Sounds good! Yes, I am interested in working together on the HFS/HFS+ driver. :)
> And, yes, I can consider to be the maintainer of HFS/HFS+ driver. We can
> maintain the HFS/HFS+ driver together because two maintainers are better than
> one. Especially, if there is the practical need of having HFS/HFS+ driver in
> Linux kernel.
OK, then let's do this together! While I'm already a kernel maintainer (for arch/sh),
I wouldn't call myself an expert on filesystems and I feel way more comfortable working
on this when there is a second person around with experience with hacking on filesystems.
Can you send a patch to update MAINTAINERS?
My mail entry would be:
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists