lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250417182001.3903905-20-b-padhi@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 23:49:47 +0530
From: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
To: <andersson@...nel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: <afd@...com>, <hnagalla@...com>, <u-kumar1@...com>, <jm@...com>,
        <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        <jkangas@...hat.com>, <eballetbo@...hat.com>, <b-padhi@...com>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v10 19/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor rproc_request_mbox() implementations into common driver

The rproc_request_mbox() implementations in TI K3 R5, DSP and M4
remoteproc drivers acquire the mailbox channel and send the same message
through the acquired channel.

Refactor the above function into the ti_k3_common.c driver as
k3_rproc_request_mbox() and use it throughout R5, DSP and M4 drivers.

Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
---
v10: Changelog:
1. Split [v9 14/26] into [v10 18/33] and [v10 19/33] patches. 

Link to v9:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250317120622.1746415-15-b-padhi@ti.com/

 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c         | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h         |  1 +
 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 36 +---------------------
 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c  | 37 +----------------------
 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c  | 37 +----------------------
 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
index 011a871860754..313f3695bf2ec 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
@@ -157,5 +157,41 @@ int k3_rproc_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_rproc_release);
 
+int k3_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct k3_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
+	struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
+	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	client->dev = dev;
+	client->tx_done = NULL;
+	client->rx_callback = k3_rproc_mbox_callback;
+	client->tx_block = false;
+	client->knows_txdone = false;
+
+	kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox),
+				     "mbox_request_channel failed\n");
+
+	/*
+	 * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
+	 * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
+	 *
+	 * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
+	 * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
+	 */
+	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
+		mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_rproc_request_mbox);
+
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 common Remoteproc code");
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h
index c1af39cd288c1..721492fa0fb71 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h
@@ -92,4 +92,5 @@ void k3_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data);
 void k3_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
 int k3_rproc_reset(struct k3_rproc *kproc);
 int k3_rproc_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc);
+int k3_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
 #endif /* REMOTEPROC_TI_K3_COMMON_H */
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
index 577dcd65093a9..d1d35f819c232 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
@@ -24,40 +24,6 @@
 
 #define KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK	(SZ_16M - 1)
 
-static int k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
-{
-	struct k3_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
-	struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
-	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
-	int ret;
-
-	client->dev = dev;
-	client->tx_done = NULL;
-	client->rx_callback = k3_rproc_mbox_callback;
-	client->tx_block = false;
-	client->knows_txdone = false;
-
-	kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
-	if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox))
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox),
-				     "mbox_request_channel failed\n");
-
-	/*
-	 * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
-	 * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
-	 *
-	 * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
-	 * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
-	 */
-	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
-		mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
 /*
  * The C66x DSP cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a
  * generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the DSP internal
@@ -443,7 +409,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	kproc->dev = dev;
 	kproc->data = data;
 
-	ret = k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
+	ret = k3_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
index a59fa835d8de6..15e7943a12c14 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
@@ -21,41 +21,6 @@
 #include "ti_sci_proc.h"
 #include "ti_k3_common.h"
 
-static int k3_m4_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
-{
-	struct k3_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
-	struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
-	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
-	int ret;
-
-	client->dev = dev;
-	client->tx_done = NULL;
-	client->rx_callback = k3_rproc_mbox_callback;
-	client->tx_block = false;
-	client->knows_txdone = false;
-
-	kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
-	if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox))
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox),
-				     "mbox_request_channel failed\n");
-
-	/*
-	 * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
-	 * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
-	 *
-	 * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
-	 * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
-	 */
-	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
-		mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * The M4 cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a
  * generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the internal
@@ -499,7 +464,7 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dev_info(dev, "configured M4F for remoteproc mode\n");
 	}
 
-	ret = k3_m4_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
+	ret = k3_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
index dedc9456983e0..6177610d63980 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -284,41 +284,6 @@ static inline int k3_r5_core_run(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
 				       0, PROC_BOOT_CTRL_FLAG_R5_CORE_HALT);
 }
 
-static int k3_r5_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
-{
-	struct k3_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
-	struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
-	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
-	int ret;
-
-	client->dev = dev;
-	client->tx_done = NULL;
-	client->rx_callback = k3_rproc_mbox_callback;
-	client->tx_block = false;
-	client->knows_txdone = false;
-
-	kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
-	if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox))
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox),
-				     "mbox_request_channel failed\n");
-
-	/*
-	 * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
-	 * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
-	 *
-	 * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
-	 * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
-	 */
-	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
-		mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * The R5F cores have controls for both a reset and a halt/run. The code
  * execution from DDR requires the initial boot-strapping code to be run
@@ -1357,7 +1322,7 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		kproc = core->kproc;
 		rproc = kproc->rproc;
 
-		ret = k3_r5_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
+		ret = k3_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ