[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAFULUo9BMf306s3@gaggiata.pivistrello.it>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 21:19:09 +0200
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, Moteen Shah <m-shah@...com>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Hiago De Franco <hiagofranco@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-am654: Add
ti,suppress-v1p8-ena
Hello Judith,
thanks for the patch.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 01:26:52PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
> This patch documents ti,suppress-v1p8-ena which is a flag
> used to suppress V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA in sdhci_am654 driver. This
> quirk is necessary to fix fail init issues across various
> types of SD cards tested on Sitara K3 SoCs.
bindings are supposed to describe the hardware, not the driver.
You should rephrase the commit message and the description of the property with
this in mind.
In addition, I think that the dt-bindings is supposed to be before the driver
patch in the series.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists