[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b051466d-534d-4e93-9ba5-52401aed82ef@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:37:15 -0500
From: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
CC: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter
<adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, Moteen
Shah <m-shah@...com>,
Hiago De Franco <hiagofranco@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-am654: Add
ti,suppress-v1p8-ena
Hi Francesco,
On 4/17/25 2:19 PM, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> Hello Judith,
> thanks for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 01:26:52PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> This patch documents ti,suppress-v1p8-ena which is a flag
>> used to suppress V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA in sdhci_am654 driver. This
>> quirk is necessary to fix fail init issues across various
>> types of SD cards tested on Sitara K3 SoCs.
>
> bindings are supposed to describe the hardware, not the driver.
>
> You should rephrase the commit message and the description of the property with
> this in mind.
>
> In addition, I think that the dt-bindings is supposed to be before the driver
> patch in the series.
>
Right, will fix for v3 along with adding fixes tags.
~ Judith
Powered by blists - more mailing lists