[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250418074523.ae5e9f56950e431d60fc0c79@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 07:45:23 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Record trace_clock and recover when reboot
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:18:04 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:17:29 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > @@ -6004,6 +6004,7 @@ struct trace_mod_entry {
> > };
> >
> > struct trace_scratch {
> > + char clock[TRACE_CLOCK_NAME_MAX];
> > unsigned long text_addr;
> > unsigned long nr_entries;
> > struct trace_mod_entry entries[];
> > @@ -6114,6 +6115,8 @@ static void update_last_data(struct trace_array *tr)
> > if (tr->scratch) {
> > struct trace_scratch *tscratch = tr->scratch;
> >
> > + strscpy(tscratch->clock, trace_clocks[tr->clock_id].name,
>
> Why copy the name and not the clock_id?
The name is more robust if we rebooted in the different kernel.
>
> The clock ids should not change between kernels.
Hmm, I thought it could be changed because we didn't define it.
----
static struct {
u64 (*func)(void);
const char *name;
int in_ns; /* is this clock in nanoseconds? */
} trace_clocks[] = {
{ trace_clock_local, "local", 1 },
{ trace_clock_global, "global", 1 },
{ trace_clock_counter, "counter", 0 },
{ trace_clock_jiffies, "uptime", 0 },
{ trace_clock, "perf", 1 },
{ ktime_get_mono_fast_ns, "mono", 1 },
{ ktime_get_raw_fast_ns, "mono_raw", 1 },
{ ktime_get_boot_fast_ns, "boot", 1 },
{ ktime_get_tai_fast_ns, "tai", 1 },
ARCH_TRACE_CLOCKS
};
----
So the clock id is just an index of this array. That can be changed
easily between the kernel version. If we discard the previous boot
data in that case, I agree with using clock ids.
(Another reason for the implementation is that tracing_set_clock()
only accepts a name, but this is just due to laziness on my part. :-( )
Thank you,
>
> -- Steve
>
> > + TRACE_CLOCK_NAME_MAX);
> > memset(tscratch->entries, 0,
> > flex_array_size(tscratch, entries, tscratch->nr_entries));
> > tscratch->nr_entries = 0;
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists