[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250416170359.a0267b77d3db85ff6d5f8ac0@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:03:59 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>, Alexander Potapenko
<glider@...gle.com>, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, Dmitry Vyukov
<dvyukov@...gle.com>, Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/Kconfig: Fix allyesconfig
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:05:59 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> 64-bit allyesconfig builds fail with
>
> x86_64-linux-ld: kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE
>
> Bisect points to commit 6f110a5e4f99 ("Disable SLUB_TINY for build
> testing") as the responsible commit. Reverting that patch does indeed
> fix the problem. Further analysis shows that disabling SLUB_TINY enables
> KASAN, and that KASAN is responsible for the image size increase.
>
> Solve the build problem by disabling KASAN for test builds.
>
Excluding KASAN from COMPILE_TEST builds is regrettable.
Can we address this some other way? One way might be to alter or
disable the KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE check if COMPILE_TEST? That will be sad
for anyone who tries to boot a COMPILE_TEST kernel, but who the heck
does that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists