[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0739b6b-b043-47f1-8044-f6ed68d39f2c@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:10:09 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: fix compile-test defaults
On 17/04/2025 08:55, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Commit 3f66425a4fc8 ("cpufreq: Enable COMPILE_TEST on Arm drivers")
> enabled compile testing of most Arm CPUFreq drivers but left the
> existing default values unchanged so that many drivers are enabled by
> default whenever COMPILE_TEST is selected.
>
> This specifically results in the S3C64XX CPUFreq driver being enabled
> and initialised during boot of non-S3C64XX platforms with the following
> error logged:
>
> cpufreq: Unable to obtain ARMCLK: -2
But isn't this fixed by my commit (d4f610a9bafd)? How is it possible to
reproduce above error when you are NOT test compiling?
>
> Commit d4f610a9bafd ("cpufreq: Do not enable by default during compile
> testing") recently fixed most of the default values, but two entries
> were missed
That's not really a bug to be fixed. No things got worse by missing two
entries, so how this part could be called something needing fixing?
> and two could use a more specific default condition.
Two entries for more specific default - before they were ALWAYS default,
so again I narrowed it from wide default. Nothing to fix here. You can
narrow it further but claiming that my commit made something worse looks
like a stretch - and that's a meaning of fixing someone's commit.
>
> Fix the default values for drivers that can be compile tested and that
> should be enabled by default when not compile testing.
>
> Fixes: 3f66425a4fc8 ("cpufreq: Enable COMPILE_TEST on Arm drivers")
> Fixes: d4f610a9bafd ("cpufreq: Do not enable by default during compile testing")
That's not correct tag - it introduced no new issues, did not make
things worse, so nothing to fix there, if I understand correctly.
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 6.12
> Cc: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - rebase on commit d4f610a9bafd ("cpufreq: Do not enable by default
> during compile testing")
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists