linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Fix missing uncore sysfs during CPU hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <174488871345.2548.2694845839583512280.b4-ty@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:18:33 +0300
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, hdegoede@...hat.com, 
 shouyeliu <shouyeliu@...il.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 stable@...r.kernel.org, Shouye Liu <shouyeliu@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Fix missing uncore
 sysfs during CPU hotplug

On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:23:21 +0800, shouyeliu wrote:

> In certain situations, the sysfs for uncore may not be present when all
> CPUs in a package are offlined and then brought back online after boot.
> 
> This issue can occur if there is an error in adding the sysfs entry due
> to a memory allocation failure. Retrying to bring the CPUs online will
> not resolve the issue, as the uncore_cpu_mask is already set for the
> package before the failure condition occurs.
> 
> [...]


Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo-fixes branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-fixes branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

The list of commits applied:
[1/1] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Fix missing uncore sysfs during CPU hotplug
      commit: 8d6955ed76e8a47115f2ea1d9c263ee6f505d737

--
 i.