[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s67nprw4a4xu3eqgom4hu6tvabt52l3aq6hp7klnkb4mocbzeu@rsyvaykn3e2j>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:57:43 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>
Cc: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>, Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>, Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] i2c: pasemi: Improve timeout handling
Hi Sven,
> static int pasemi_smb_waitready(struct pasemi_smbus *smbus)
> {
> int timeout = 100;
> + int ret;
can you please declare this "ret" inside the if() statement
below?
> unsigned int status;
>
> if (smbus->use_irq) {
> reinit_completion(&smbus->irq_completion);
> reg_write(smbus, REG_IMASK, SMSTA_XEN | SMSTA_MTN);
> - wait_for_completion_timeout(&smbus->irq_completion, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&smbus->irq_completion, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
> reg_write(smbus, REG_IMASK, 0);
> status = reg_read(smbus, REG_SMSTA);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(smbus->dev,
> + "Completion wait failed with %d, status 0x%08x\n",
> + ret, status);
> + return ret;
> + } else if (ret == 0) {
> + dev_warn(smbus->dev, "Timeout, status 0x%08x\n", status);
> + return -ETIME;
> + }
> } else {
> status = reg_read(smbus, REG_SMSTA);
> while (!(status & SMSTA_XEN) && timeout--) {
> msleep(1);
> status = reg_read(smbus, REG_SMSTA);
> }
> +
> + if (timeout < 0) {
> + dev_warn(smbus->dev, "Timeout, status 0x%08x\n", status);
this is an error and it's treated as an error, can we please
print dev_err()?
Andi
> + return -ETIME;
> + }
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists