[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WvoAxfipbsG1O-WXBfoPn2kEvgQk495AdMike7swgnpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 12:27:18 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
oliver.upton@...ux.dev, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, maz@...nel.org,
bwicaksono@...dia.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 4/6] arm64: cputype: Add QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO_3XX_GOLD
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:55 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 401c3333bb2396aa52e4121887a6f6a6e2f040bc ]
> >
> > Add a definition for the Qualcomm Kryo 300-series Gold cores.
>
> Why are we adding unused defines to stable?
I don't really have a strong opinion, but I can see the logic at some
level. This patch definitely doesn't _hurt_ and it seems plausible
that a define like this could be used in a future errata. Having this
already in stable would mean that the future errata would just pick
cleanly without anyone having to track down the original patch.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists