[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4fb6d880-3d5f-4d42-8419-dcc697949a10@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 12:20:13 +0100
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-video@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Martin Mares <mj@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v2 1/2] x86/boot: Remove semicolon from "rep"
prefixes
On 18/04/2025 12:15 pm, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 12:24 PM Andrew Cooper
> <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
>> On 18/04/2025 8:13 am, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/video.c b/arch/x86/boot/video.c
>>> index f2e96905b3fe..0641c8c46aee 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/video.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/video.c
>>> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static void restore_screen(void)
>>> "shrw %%cx ; "
>>> "jnc 1f ; "
>>> "stosw \n\t"
>>> - "1: rep;stosl ; "
>>> + "1: rep stosl ; "
>>> "popw %%es"
>> Doesn't this one still need a separator between STOSL and POPW ?
> ";" is a separator as well.
Yes, it is. I've clearly not had enough coffee yet. Sorry for the noise.
~Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists