[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgTpQ32XLfRpbngZkvw4ws_L7t2N6hQY0YNykZgZhGt3wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 19:01:52 +0530
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
"open list:SAMSUNG THERMAL DRIVER" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SAMSUNG THERMAL DRIVER" <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:CLANG/LLVM BUILD SUPPORT:Keyword:b(?i:clang|llvm)b" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] drivers/thermal/exymos: Remove redundant IS_ERR()
checks for clk_sec clock
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 at 13:41, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:07:49PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> > Remove unnecessary IS_ERR() checks for the clk_sec clock,
> > the clk_enable() and clk_disable() functions can handle NULL clock
> > pointers, so the additional checks are redundant and have been removed
> > to simplify the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
>
> Typo in the subject: s/exymos/exynos/
>
Thanks for your review comments.
Opps, I will fix this next version it got skipped.
Thanks
-Anand
Powered by blists - more mailing lists