[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250418135247.kf3syqrv3lznmcbf@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:52:47 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 02/14] net: enetc: add command BD ring
support for i.MX95 ENETC
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 01:49:25PM +0000, Wei Fang wrote:
> Do we need to retain cbdr_size in struct ntmp_user? Or just remove it in
> next version?
It seems redundant with cbdr->bd_num, so yes, please remove it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists