[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250418104702.52f3afb3@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:47:02 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, kuniyu@...zon.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] udp: Add tracepoint for udp_sendmsg()
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:33:51 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> In fact, if there is a clean up, it should be adding "_tp" to all
> tracepoints that do not have a corresponding trace event attached to them.
> As they are in kernel only, that change should not cause any ABI breakage.
Actually, I think I'll make it where tracepoints created via
DECLARE_TRACE() will automatically get the "_tp" ending. That would help
enforce this API.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists