[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250418155102.563607f5@jic23-huawei>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:51:02 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, David Lechner
<dlechner@...libre.com>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy
Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich
<Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Cosmin Tanislav
<cosmin.tanislav@...log.com>, Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@...il.com>,
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com>, Andreas Klinger
<ak@...klinger.de>, Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] iio: chemical: pms7003: use aligned_s64 for
timestamp
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:51:37 +0100
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 18:35 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:52:36 -0500
> > David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Follow the pattern of other drivers and use aligned_s64 for the
> > > timestamp. This will ensure that the timestamp is correctly aligned on
> > > all architectures.
> > >
> > > Also move the unaligned.h header while touching this since it was the
> > > only one not in alphabetical order.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c | 5 +++--
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c
> > > index
> > > d0bd94912e0a3492641acd955adbc2184f4a11b3..e05ce1f12065c65d14b66ab86e291fab47805de
> > > c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c
> > > @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
> > > * Copyright (c) Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@...il.com>
> > > */
> > >
> > > -#include <linux/unaligned.h>
> > > #include <linux/completion.h>
> > > #include <linux/device.h>
> > > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > > @@ -19,6 +18,8 @@
> > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > > #include <linux/serdev.h>
> > > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > > +#include <linux/unaligned.h>
> > >
> > > #define PMS7003_DRIVER_NAME "pms7003"
> > >
> > > @@ -76,7 +77,7 @@ struct pms7003_state {
> > > /* Used to construct scan to push to the IIO buffer */
> > > struct {
> > > u16 data[3]; /* PM1, PM2P5, PM10 */
> > > - s64 ts;
> > > + aligned_s64 ts;
> >
> > Bug I think.. So another one that really needs a fixes tag.
> > For all these we might be lucky with padding on the allocations
> > but we shouldn't really rely on that.
>
> Agreed... We're likely not that lucky for x86-32
Applied with
Fixes: 13e945631c2f ("iio:chemical:pms7003: Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak.")
and +CC stable.
>
> - Nuno Sá
> >
> > > } scan;
> > > };
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists