[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250418-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-v2-0-d6a5d2b1c9fe@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:17:12 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>,
Ramona Gradinariu <ramona.gradinariu@...log.com>,
Robert Budai <robert.budai@...log.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>,
Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: more timestamp alignment
Wile reviewing [1], I noticed a few more cases where we can use
aligned_s64 or need __aligned(8) on data structures used with
iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20250413103443.2420727-1-jic23@kernel.org/
---
Changes in v2:
- Dropped patches that were already applied.
- Added Fixes tags.
- Dropped the (insufficient) bmc150-accel fix that snuck in the adis16550 patch.
- Expand mprls0025pa patch to remove struct mpr_chan.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250417-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-v1-0-eafac1e22318@baylibre.com
---
David Lechner (2):
iio: imu: adis16550: align buffers for timestamp
iio: pressure: mprls0025pa: use aligned_s64 for timestamp
drivers/iio/imu/adis16550.c | 2 +-
drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.h | 17 ++++++-----------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 52d349884738c346961e153f195f4c7fe186fcf4
change-id: 20250416-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-6c6c6a87ebda
Best regards,
--
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists