[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<MA0P287MB2262E14F6F9758646320F7CBFEBE2@MA0P287MB2262.INDP287.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 09:24:23 +0800
From: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
To: Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>, Uwe Kleine-König
<ukleinek@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pwm: sophgo: add driver for SG2044
On 2025/4/18 10:29, Longbin Li wrote:
> Add PWM controller for SG2044 on base of SG2042.
>
> Signed-off-by: Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
> index 23a83843ba53..26147ec596c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
> * the running period.
> * - When PERIOD and HLPERIOD is set to 0, the PWM wave output will
> * be stopped and the output is pulled to high.
> + * - SG2044 support polarity while SG2042 does not. When PWMSTART is
> + * false, POLARITY being NORMAL will make output being low,
> + * POLARITY being INVERSED will make output being high.
> * See the datasheet [1] for more details.
> * [1]:https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/tree/main/SG2042/TRM
> */
> @@ -26,6 +29,10 @@
> #include <linux/pwm.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
>
> +#define SG2044_REG_POLARITY 0x40
> +#define SG2044_REG_PWMSTART 0x44
> +#define SG2044_REG_PWM_OE 0xD0
SG2044_REG_xxx, the prefix looks inconsistent with
SG2042_PWM_HLPERIOD/SG2042_PWM_PERIOD. Can it be unified?
The others look fine.
Reviewed-by: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
[......]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists