[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAPRbb93lJrnEE5l@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 19:38:05 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] iio: adc: ad4695: use IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 05:58:33PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> Use IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS to declare the buffer that gets used with
> iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(). This makes the code a bit easier to read
> and understand.
>
> AD4695_MAX_CHANNEL_SIZE macro is dropped since it was making the line
> too long and didn't add that much value.
>
> AD4695_MAX_CHANNELS + 2 is changed to AD4695_MAX_CHANNELS + 1 because
> previously we were overallocating. AD4695_MAX_CHANNELS is the number of
> of voltage channels and + 1 is for the temperature channel.
...
> -/* Max size of 1 raw sample in bytes. */
> -#define AD4695_MAX_CHANNEL_SIZE 2
> /* Raw conversion data received. */
> - u8 buf[ALIGN((AD4695_MAX_CHANNELS + 2) * AD4695_MAX_CHANNEL_SIZE,
> - sizeof(s64)) + sizeof(s64)] __aligned(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN);
> + IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS(u8, buf, (AD4695_MAX_CHANNELS + 1) * 2)
> + __aligned(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN);
I would rather expect this to be properly written as u16 / __le16 / __be16
instead of playing tricks with u8.
With all comments given so far I would expect here something like:
IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS(u16, buf, AD4695_MAX_CHANNELS + 1);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists