[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250420150244.127569-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 23:02:44 +0800
From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...il.com>
To: alexjlzheng@...il.com
Cc: alexjlzheng@...cent.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] kernfs: switch global locks to per-fs lock
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 23:36:57 +0800, Jinliang Zheng wrote:
> From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...cent.com>
>
> The kernfs implementation has big lock granularity so every kernfs-based
> (e.g., sysfs, cgroup) fs are able to compete the locks. This patchset
> switches the global locks to per-fs locks.
>
> In fact, the implementation of global locks has not yet introduced
> performance issues. But in the long run, more and more file systems will
> be implemented based on the kernfs framework, so this optimization is
> meaningful.
>
> There are three global locks now, kernfs_idr_lock, kernfs_rename_lock
> and kernfs_pr_cont_lock. We only switch kernfs_idr_lock and
> kernfs_rename_lock here, because kernfs_pr_cont_lock is on a cold path.
>
> Changelog:
> v2: Only switch kernfs_idr_lock and kernfs_rename_lock to per-fs
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250411183109.6334-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com/
>
> Jinliang Zheng (2):
> kernfs: switch global kernfs_idr_lock to per-fs lock
> kernfs: switch global kernfs_rename_lock to per-fs lock
>
> fs/kernfs/dir.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
> fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Ding Dong ~
thanks,
Jinliang Zheng. :)
>
> --
> 2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists