[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89b3fbd5-d817-4f43-9721-6a64e5153be6@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:45:54 +0800
From: Zhenhua Huang <quic_zhenhuah@...cinc.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
CC: <cl@...ux.com>, <rientjes@...gle.com>, <vbabka@...e.cz>,
<roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: clean up slab->obj_exts always
Thanks Suren.
On 2025/4/19 7:09, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 8:17 AM Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 02:14:59PM +0800, Zhenhua Huang wrote:
>>> When memory allocation profiling is disabled at runtime or due to an
>>> error, shutdown_mem_profiling() is called: slab->obj_exts which
>>> previously allocated remains.
>>> It won't be cleared by unaccount_slab() because of
>>> mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() not true. It's incorrect, slab->obj_exts
>>> should always be cleaned up in unaccount_slab() to avoid following error:
>>>
>>> [...]BUG: Bad page state in process...
>>> ..
>>> [...]page dumped because: page still charged to cgroup
>>>
>>> Fixes: 21c690a349baa ("mm: introduce slabobj_ext to support slab object extensions")
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhenhua Huang <quic_zhenhuah@...cinc.com>
>
> Thanks for reporting and fixing the issue!
>
>>> ---
>>
>> Acked-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
>>
>> I reproduced the issue locally and confirmed that this patch fixes
>> the issue.
>>
>> Tested-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
>>
>> By the way, I think this should probably be backported to -stable?
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Harry / Hyeonggon
>>
>>> mm/slub.c | 8 ++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>>> index dac149df1be1..b42ce3a88806 100644
>>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>>> @@ -2023,7 +2023,7 @@ int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -/* Should be called only if mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() */
>>> +/* Should be called if slab_obj_exts(slab) */
>>> static noinline void free_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
>>> {
>>> struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts;
>>> @@ -2592,7 +2592,11 @@ static __always_inline void account_slab(struct slab *slab, int order,
>>> static __always_inline void unaccount_slab(struct slab *slab, int order,
>>> struct kmem_cache *s)
>>> {
>>> - if (memcg_kmem_online() || need_slab_obj_ext())
>>> + /*
>>> + * The slab object extensions should now be freed regardless of
>>> + * whether mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() or not now.
>
> This comment does not explain why. I amended it in my suggestion below.
I will follow your suggestion.
>
>>> + */
>>> + if (memcg_kmem_online() || slab_obj_exts(slab))
>>> free_slab_obj_exts(slab);
>
> free_slab_obj_exts() will be checking again that for
> slab_obj_exts(slab) != NULL. Since this change effectively removes the
> static key check (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() call inside
> need_slab_obj_ext()), I think we can simply make free_slab_obj_exts()
> inline function and remove the above condition completely. IOW:
>
Got it. I'll send another version that includes these changes.
> static inline void free_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
> {
> struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts;
>
> obj_exts = slab_obj_exts(slab);
> if (!obj_exts)
> return;
> ...
> slab->obj_exts = 0;
> }
>
> static __always_inline void unaccount_slab(...)
> {
> /*
> * The slab object extensions should be freed regardless of
> * whether mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() or not because profiling
> * might have been disabled after slab->obj_exts got allocated.
> */
> free_slab_obj_exts(slab);
> ...
> }
>
>>>
>>> mod_node_page_state(slab_pgdat(slab), cache_vmstat_idx(s),
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists