lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250421-topic-am62-partialio-v6-12-b4-v6-1-3b5cefab1339@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:19:59 +0200
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, 
 Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Cc: Vishal Mahaveer <vishalm@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, 
 Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, Sebin Francis <sebin.francis@...com>, 
 Kendall Willis <k-willis@...com>, Akashdeep Kaur <a-kaur@...com>, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/2] firmware: ti_sci: Support transfers without
 response

Check the header flags if an response is expected or not. If it is not
expected skip the receive part of ti_sci_do_xfer(). This prepares the
driver for one-way messages as prepare_sleep for Partial-IO.

Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
index 806a975fff22ae00ecb88587b2c47ba172120bc2..09d11e75e14e6a6a82f6d99ab1852c142aeb7e5f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
@@ -398,6 +398,9 @@ static void ti_sci_put_one_xfer(struct ti_sci_xfers_info *minfo,
 static inline int ti_sci_do_xfer(struct ti_sci_info *info,
 				 struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer)
 {
+	struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *hdr = (struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *)xfer->tx_message.buf;
+	bool response_expected = !!(hdr->flags & (TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED |
+						  TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_RECEIVED));
 	int ret;
 	int timeout;
 	struct device *dev = info->dev;
@@ -409,12 +412,12 @@ static inline int ti_sci_do_xfer(struct ti_sci_info *info,
 
 	ret = 0;
 
-	if (system_state <= SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
+	if (response_expected && system_state <= SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
 		/* And we wait for the response. */
 		timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(info->desc->max_rx_timeout_ms);
 		if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&xfer->done, timeout))
 			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
-	} else {
+	} else if (response_expected) {
 		/*
 		 * If we are !running, we cannot use wait_for_completion_timeout
 		 * during noirq phase, so we must manually poll the completion.

-- 
2.49.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ