[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250421095521.1500427-6-nylon.chen@sifive.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:55:21 +0800
From: Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@...ive.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@...ive.com>,
Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 5/5] pwm: sifive: clarify inverted compare logic in comments
The FU740‑C000 manual says “pwms ≥ pwmcmpX -> HIGH”, but in Figure 29 pwmcmpXcenter
is forced to 0 via an XOR, so hardware actually outputs HIGH when pwms < pwmcmpX.
Thus pwmcmp holds the off‑period count, and the driver must invert it
to expose a normal active‑high interface.
Co-developed-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Signed-off-by: Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@...ive.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
index 1404c383461d..fd1660e16a4c 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
@@ -4,11 +4,28 @@
* For SiFive's PWM IP block documentation please refer Chapter 14 of
* Reference Manual : https://static.dev.sifive.com/FU540-C000-v1.0.pdf
*
+ * PWM output inversion: According to the SiFive Reference manual
+ * the output of each comparator is high whenever the value of pwms is
+ * greater than or equal to the corresponding pwmcmpX[Reference Manual].
+ *
+ * Figure 29 in the same manual shows that the pwmcmpXcenter bit is
+ * hard‑tied to 0 (XNOR), which effectively inverts the comparison so that
+ * the output goes HIGH when `pwms < pwmcmpX`.
+ *
+ * In other words, each pwmcmp register actually defines the **inactive**
+ * (low) period of the pulse, not the active time exactly opposite to what
+ * the documentation text implies.
+ *
+ * To compensate, this driver always **inverts** the duty value when reading
+ * or writing pwmcmp registers , so that users interact with a conventional
+ * **active‑high** PWM interface.
+ *
+ *
* Limitations:
* - When changing both duty cycle and period, we cannot prevent in
* software that the output might produce a period with mixed
* settings (new period length and old duty cycle).
- * - The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle.
+ * - The hardware cannot generate a 0% duty cycle.
* - The hardware generates only inverted output.
*/
#include <linux/clk.h>
@@ -113,6 +130,8 @@ static int pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
u32 duty, val, inactive;
inactive = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
+ /* PWM hardware uses 'inactive' counts in pwmcmp, so invert to get actual duty.
+ * Here, 'inactive' is the low time and we compute duty as max_count - inactive. */
duty = (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1 - inactive;
state->enabled = duty > 0;
@@ -160,6 +179,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
frac = num / state->period;
/* The hardware cannot generate a 0% duty cycle */
frac = min(frac, (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1);
+ /* pwmcmp register must be loaded with the inactive - time count (invert the duty) */
inactive = (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1 - frac;
mutex_lock(&ddata->lock);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists