[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PN3PR01MB95973648BB4FECBB2E24C5C7B8B82@PN3PR01MB9597.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:24:41 +0530
From: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
To: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Aun-Ali Zaidi <admin@...eit.net>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
airlied@...hat.com, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com, dwaipayanray1@...il.com,
lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, tamird@...il.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Asahi Linux Mailing List <asahi@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Use proper printk format in appletbdrm
On 21-04-2025 07:19 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> I didn't realize this was so subtle with the backporting. I don't think
> I can take this on, sorry.
Any change needed or just because some other maintainer manages this? Although Tbh, I really don't care about backporting since T2 Mac users are still using patched kernels provided by us. I'd rather free my mind in getting this done.
>
> Le Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 06:40:23PM +0530, Aditya Garg a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On 21-04-2025 06:38 pm, Aditya Garg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21-04-2025 06:37 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
>>>>> On 21-04-2025 05:35 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
>>>>>>> Can I have a feedback from some DRM maintainer on this? AFAIK merge window is over for some time now. It's been more than a week and last time when I submitted, it just stayed in the mailing list without any feedback.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DRM hides the merge window from committers so that's not super relevant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a DRM committer and can pick this up if necessary but it's not
>>>>>> clear to me what's going thru with DRM vs elsewhere.
>>>>>
>>>>> All the three patches are intended to go through DRM. IIRC Petr, the vsprintf maintainers had requested for that to be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> The relevant patches have been Reviewed-by Petr as well.
>>>>
>>>> OK, will queue this today.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Also, Petr has requested them to be backported for 6.15
>>
>> To be more clear, he does not have objection for backporting to 6.15. Although its your call.
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists