linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] iio: introduce IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56f5c56e-1993-4bbd-bbce-b9c954fe8b8c@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:03:50 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] iio: introduce IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS

On 4/21/25 8:03 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 07:36:18 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 1:59 AM David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
>>>

...

> 
> Maybe we could add...
> IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS_FOR_DMA()
> Might be worth it?
> 
After reading everyone's comments, that was my first instinct. We should have
2 forms of the macro, one for DMA-safe and one for not.