[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6806769e.050a0220.297747.02f9.GAE@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:47:26 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+839ea12926e5df362ff1@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [ntfs3?] possible deadlock in ni_set_compress
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: cfb2e2c57aef Merge tag 'mm-hotfixes-stable-2025-04-16-19-5..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13441fe4580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=b8b55ae4a62d79b8
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=839ea12926e5df362ff1
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/5590e609f231/disk-cfb2e2c5.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6865703da4ca/vmlinux-cfb2e2c5.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6944af88a20f/bzImage-cfb2e2c5.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+839ea12926e5df362ff1@...kaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.15.0-rc2-syzkaller-00087-gcfb2e2c57aef #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.5.237/7937 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88805e9fca70 (&ni->ni_lock#3/5){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ni_lock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1105 [inline]
ffff88805e9fca70 (&ni->ni_lock#3/5){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ni_set_compress+0x174/0x5a0 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:3359
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88805e9fcea8 (mapping.invalidate_lock#12){++++}-{4:4}, at: filemap_invalidate_lock include/linux/fs.h:912 [inline]
ffff88805e9fcea8 (mapping.invalidate_lock#12){++++}-{4:4}, at: ntfs_fileattr_set+0x2a9/0x4a0 fs/ntfs3/file.c:108
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (mapping.invalidate_lock#12){++++}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0x116/0x2f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5866
down_read+0xb3/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1524
filemap_invalidate_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:922 [inline]
filemap_fault+0x66b/0x13d0 mm/filemap.c:3391
__do_fault+0x135/0x390 mm/memory.c:5098
do_read_fault mm/memory.c:5518 [inline]
do_fault mm/memory.c:5652 [inline]
do_pte_missing mm/memory.c:4160 [inline]
handle_pte_fault+0x3f0c/0x61c0 mm/memory.c:5997
__handle_mm_fault mm/memory.c:6140 [inline]
handle_mm_fault+0x1030/0x1aa0 mm/memory.c:6309
do_user_addr_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1388 [inline]
handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1480 [inline]
exc_page_fault+0x2bb/0x920 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1538
asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:623
do_strncpy_from_user lib/strncpy_from_user.c:-1 [inline]
strncpy_from_user+0xb8/0x280 lib/strncpy_from_user.c:130
getname_flags+0xf1/0x530 fs/namei.c:157
getname include/linux/fs.h:2852 [inline]
do_sys_openat2+0xbf/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1423
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1444 [inline]
__do_sys_open fs/open.c:1452 [inline]
__se_sys_open fs/open.c:1448 [inline]
__x64_sys_open+0x226/0x280 fs/open.c:1448
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0x116/0x2f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5866
__might_fault+0xc6/0x120 mm/memory.c:7151
_inline_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:192 [inline]
_copy_to_user+0x2c/0xb0 lib/usercopy.c:26
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:225 [inline]
fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x237/0x420 fs/ioctl.c:145
ni_fiemap+0xa42/0x12a0 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:2007
ntfs_fiemap+0x134/0x180 fs/ntfs3/file.c:1380
ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:220 [inline]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x1975/0x2750 fs/ioctl.c:840
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0x80/0x160 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&ni->ni_lock#3/5){+.+.}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3166 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3285 [inline]
validate_chain+0xa69/0x24e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3909
__lock_acquire+0xad5/0xd80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5235
lock_acquire+0x116/0x2f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5866
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:601 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x1a5/0x10c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:746
ni_lock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1105 [inline]
ni_set_compress+0x174/0x5a0 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:3359
ntfs_fileattr_set+0x2ef/0x4a0 fs/ntfs3/file.c:114
vfs_fileattr_set+0x901/0xd50 fs/ioctl.c:696
ioctl_setflags fs/ioctl.c:728 [inline]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x180c/0x2750 fs/ioctl.c:869
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0x80/0x160 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&ni->ni_lock#3/5 --> &mm->mmap_lock --> mapping.invalidate_lock#12
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(mapping.invalidate_lock#12);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
lock(mapping.invalidate_lock#12);
lock(&ni->ni_lock#3/5);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz.5.237/7937:
#0: ffff88807cdac420 (sb_writers#25){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:600
#1: ffff88805e9fcd08 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#31){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:867 [inline]
#1: ffff88805e9fcd08 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#31){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vfs_fileattr_set+0x13b/0xd50 fs/ioctl.c:681
#2: ffff88805e9fcea8 (mapping.invalidate_lock#12){++++}-{4:4}, at: filemap_invalidate_lock include/linux/fs.h:912 [inline]
#2: ffff88805e9fcea8 (mapping.invalidate_lock#12){++++}-{4:4}, at: ntfs_fileattr_set+0x2a9/0x4a0 fs/ntfs3/file.c:108
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 7937 Comm: syz.5.237 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc2-syzkaller-00087-gcfb2e2c57aef #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x2e1/0x300 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2079
check_noncircular+0x142/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2211
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3166 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3285 [inline]
validate_chain+0xa69/0x24e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3909
__lock_acquire+0xad5/0xd80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5235
lock_acquire+0x116/0x2f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5866
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:601 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x1a5/0x10c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:746
ni_lock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1105 [inline]
ni_set_compress+0x174/0x5a0 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:3359
ntfs_fileattr_set+0x2ef/0x4a0 fs/ntfs3/file.c:114
vfs_fileattr_set+0x901/0xd50 fs/ioctl.c:696
ioctl_setflags fs/ioctl.c:728 [inline]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x180c/0x2750 fs/ioctl.c:869
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0x80/0x160 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f5dca38e169
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f5dcb1ed038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f5dca5b5fa0 RCX: 00007f5dca38e169
RDX: 00002000000006c0 RSI: 0000000040086602 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007f5dca410a68 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f5dca5b5fa0 R15: 00007ffcd4490398
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists