linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 6/9] coresight: Disable trace bus clock properly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250422122946.GF28953@e132581.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:29:46 +0100
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
	James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/9] coresight: Disable trace bus clock properly

On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 12:55:46PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> On 3/27/25 17:08, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Some CoreSight components have trace bus clocks 'atclk' and are enabled
> > using clk_prepare_enable().  These clocks are not disabled when modules
> > exit.
> > 
> > As atclk is optional, use devm_clk_get_optional_enabled() to manage it.
> > The benefit is the driver model layer can automatically disable and
> > release clocks.
> > 
> > Check the returned value with IS_ERR() to detect errors but leave the
> > NULL pointer case if the clock is not found.  And remove the error
> > handling codes which are no longer needed.
> > 
> > Fixes: d1839e687773 ("coresight: etm: retrieve and handle atclk")
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
> 
> This patch probably should be positioned right after [PATCH 4/9] which
> replaces pclk clock init with devm_clk_get_enabled().

Sure.  Will reorder patches for this.

Thanks,
Leo