linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: ti,tmp102: document optional V+ supply property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a588b9w7.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:31:20 +0200
From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,  Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
  Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,  Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,  Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
  linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,  devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: ti,tmp102: document optional V+
 supply property

>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> writes:

 > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
 >> TMP102 is powered by its V+ supply, document it. The property is called
 >> "vcc-supply" since the plus sign (+) is not a valid property character.

 > Wouldn't "vplus-supply" or "vp-supply" work?

It could, but gcc-supply is what we use for the very similar tmp108
binding, so I think it makes sense to use that here for consistency as
well:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=699383466851e3fb8284e1eefeed78ec30989b3b

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard