[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4xh3i7qikqiffxocxms4wfplg4tvemnszvywmtpkfyiqvq3age@jcq3aqvumig2>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:50:05 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, michael.christie@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] vhost: Add a KConfig knob to enable IOCTL
VHOST_FORK_FROM_OWNER
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:44:10AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
>Introduce a new config knob `CONFIG_VHOST_ENABLE_FORK_OWNER_IOCTL`,
>to control the availability of the `VHOST_FORK_FROM_OWNER` ioctl.
>When CONFIG_VHOST_ENABLE_FORK_OWNER_IOCTL is set to n, the ioctl
>is disabled, and any attempt to use it will result in failure.
>
>Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>
>---
> drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>index 020d4fbb947c..bc8fadb06f98 100644
>--- a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>+++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>@@ -96,3 +96,18 @@ config VHOST_CROSS_ENDIAN_LEGACY
> If unsure, say "N".
>
> endif
>+
>+config VHOST_ENABLE_FORK_OWNER_IOCTL
>+ bool "Enable IOCTL VHOST_FORK_FROM_OWNER"
>+ default n
>+ help
>+ This option enables the IOCTL VHOST_FORK_FROM_OWNER, which allows
>+ userspace applications to modify the thread mode for vhost devices.
>+
>+ By default, `CONFIG_VHOST_ENABLE_FORK_OWNER_IOCTL` is set to `n`,
>+ meaning the ioctl is disabled and any operation using this ioctl
>+ will fail.
>+ When the configuration is enabled (y), the ioctl becomes
>+ available, allowing users to set the mode if needed.
I think I already pointed out, but here there is a mix of tabs and
spaces that IMHO we should fix.
>+
>+ If unsure, say "N".
>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>index fb0c7fb43f78..568e43cb54a9 100644
>--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>@@ -2294,6 +2294,8 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
> r = vhost_dev_set_owner(d);
> goto done;
> }
>+
>+#ifdef CONFIG_VHOST_ENABLE_FORK_OWNER_IOCTL
As I mentioned in the previous version, IMO this patch should be merged
with the previous patch. I don't think it is good for bisection to have
a commit with an IOCTL supported in any case and in the next commit
instead supported only through a config.
Maybe I'm missing something, but what's the point of having a separate
patch for this?
Thanks,
Stefano
> if (ioctl == VHOST_FORK_FROM_OWNER) {
> u8 inherit_owner;
> /*inherit_owner can only be modified before owner is set*/
>@@ -2313,6 +2315,7 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
> r = 0;
> goto done;
> }
>+#endif
> /* You must be the owner to do anything else */
> r = vhost_dev_check_owner(d);
> if (r)
>--
>2.45.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists