[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a92eb62d-aab1-4c19-a842-4797df443cf5@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 07:57:31 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jon Pan-Doh <pandoh@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/9] Reduce ratelimit's false-positive misses
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 04:50:34PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2025-04-18 10:13:49, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > This v2 series replaces open-coded uses of the ratelimit_state structure
> > with formal APIs, counts all rate-limit misses, replaces jiffies=0 special
> > case with a flag, provides a ___ratelimit() trylock-failure fastpath
> > to (almost) eliminate false-positive misses, and adds a simple test.
> >
> > The key point of this series is the reduction of false-positive misses.
> >
> > The individual patches are as follows:
> >
> > 1. Add trivial kunit test for ratelimit.
>
> I have suggested few cosmetic changes for the above patch.
Thank you for the KUNIT tutorial, and I will apply these.
> > 2. Create functions to handle ratelimit_state internals.
> >
> > 3. Avoid open-coded use of ratelimit_state structure's ->missed
> > field.
> >
> > 4. Avoid open-coded use of ratelimit_state structure's ->missed
> > field.
> >
> > 5. Avoid open-coded use of ratelimit_state structure's internals.
> >
> > 6. Convert the ->missed field to atomic_t.
> >
> > 7. Count misses due to lock contention.
> >
> > 8. Avoid jiffies=0 special case.
> >
> > 9. Reduce ___ratelimit() false-positive rate limiting, courtesy of
> > Petr Mladek.
> >
> > 10. Allow zero ->burst to disable ratelimiting.
> >
> > 11. Force re-initialization when rate-limiting re-enabled.
> >
> > 12. Don't flush misses counter if RATELIMIT_MSG_ON_RELEASE.
> >
> > 13. Avoid atomic decrement if already rate-limited.
> >
> > 14. Avoid atomic decrement under lock if already rate-limited.
>
> The rest looks good. And I think that it is a great improvement.
> Feel free to use for the entire patchset:
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Again, thank you, and I will apply these to the series!
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists