[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAe2iULNthghEEEt@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:32:25 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: stmmac: fix multiplication overflow when
reading timestamp
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 05:07:23PM +0200, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> ns = readl(ptpaddr + GMAC_PTP_ATNR);
> - ns += readl(ptpaddr + GMAC_PTP_ATSR) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + ns += (u64)(readl(ptpaddr + GMAC_PTP_ATSR)) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
I'm not sure what the extra parens around readl() are actually trying to
do. Please drop them if they're not useful.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists