[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250422174657.GD1853@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:46:57 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
longman@...hat.com, mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, muchun.song@...ux.dev, tj@...nel.org,
mkoutny@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: relax locking on cpuset_node_allowed
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 12:30:55AM -0400, Gregory Price wrote:
> The cgroup_get_e_css reference protects the css->effective_mems, and
> calls of this interface would be subject to the same race conditions
> associated with a non-atomic access to cs->effective_mems.
>
> So while this interface cannot make strong guarantees of correctness,
> it can therefore avoid taking a global or rcu_read_lock for performance.
>
> Drop the rcu_read_lock from cpuset_node_allowed.
>
> Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
> Suggested-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index c52348bfd5db..1dc41758c62c 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -4181,10 +4181,20 @@ bool cpuset_node_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, int nid)
> if (!css)
> return true;
>
> + /*
> + * Normally, accessing effective_mems would require the cpuset_mutex
> + * or RCU read lock - but node_isset is atomic and the reference
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This should be callback_lock. rcu_read_lock() was intended for css
lifetime - which is ensured by css_get_e_css() - not a stable mask.
Otherwise looks good, makes sense to lampshade the lockless access.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists