[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad67b397-9483-d3c3-203e-687cefb9e481@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:28:02 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Matt Fleming <mfleming@...udflare.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: 10x I/O await times in 6.12
Hi,
在 2025/04/21 23:22, Keith Busch 写道:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 09:53:10AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
>> Hey there,
>>
>> We're moving to 6.12 at Cloudflare and noticed that write await times
>> in iostat are 10x what they were in 6.6. After a bit of bpftracing
>> (script to find all plug times above 10ms below), it seems like this
>> is an accounting error caused by the plug->cur_ktime optimisation
>> rather than anything more material.
>>
>> It appears as though a task can enter __submit_bio() with ->plug set
>> and a very stale cur_ktime value on the order of milliseconds. Is this
>> expected behaviour? It looks like it leads to inaccurate I/O times.
>
> There are places with a block plug that call cond_resched(), which
> doesn't invalidate the plug's cached ktime. You could end up with a
> stale ktime if your process is scheduled out.
This is wrong, scheduled out will clear cached ktime. You can check
it easily since there are not much caller to clear ktime.
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists