lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250422084340.457-1-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:43:35 +0100
From: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@...wei.com>
To: <devicetree-spec@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <robh@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/5] DT: Enable sharing resources for SMT threads

This patchset allows for sharing resources between SMT threads in the
device tree (DT).

WHY? Given the current use of the DT, it is not possible to share L1
caches, as well as other resources such as clock among SMT threads.
However, DT spec in section Section 3.8.1 [1], describes how SMT threads
can be described in the reg array, this is how PowerPC describes SMT
threads in DT.

CHALLENGE: Given discussions with the community [2], it was apparent
that it is not straightforward to implement this, since cpu-maps must
point to a particular CPU node in DT [3], Section 2.1. However, it is
not only the cpu-map but also there other nodes that point to cpu nodes
which indeed need care and changes.

SOLUTION: This led to more discussions on what the solution should look
like and based on recent converstations we ended up with the following
approach [4].

core0 {
  thread0 {
    cpu = <&cpu0 0>;
  };
  thread1 {
    cpu = <&cpu0 1>;
  };
};

In this layout, first parameter is the phandle to cpu-node and second
index would be the local-thread index in the reg array available in the
cpu-node reg property. Further, when reading the property in the cpu-map
we must know how many parameters phandle has in cpu property. Therefore,
we optionally introduced "#cpu-cells" property to indicate the number of
cells.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/releases/download/v0.4/devicetree-specification-v0.4.pdf
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/Z4FJZPRg75YIUR2l@J2N7QTR9R3/
[3] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/devicetree-spec/CAL_JsqK1yqRLD9B+G7UUp=D8K++mXHq0Rmv=1i6DL_jXyZwXAw@mail.gmail.com/

Alireza Sanaee (5):
  DT: add infra for finding CPU id from phandle.
  arm64: of: handle multiple threads in ARM cpu node
  driver/base/arch_topology: update CPU map to use the new API.
  driver/hwtracing/coresight: Use of_cpu_phandle_to_id for grabbing CPU
    id.
  DT: of_cpu_phandle_to_id to support SMT threads

 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                       | 74 ++++++++++---------
 drivers/base/arch_topology.c                  | 12 +--
 .../coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c        | 15 +---
 .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c  | 14 +---
 drivers/of/cpu.c                              | 45 +++++++++++
 include/linux/of.h                            |  3 +
 6 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ