linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.14 000/449] 6.14.3-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6a0357d08784348e677d631b76dfcc3fe79d56b7.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:07:11 +0200
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju
	 <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
        hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
        PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam	
 <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski	
 <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.14 000/449] 6.14.3-rc1 review

On Fri, 2025-04-18 at 13:03 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 12:00:33PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 23:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.14.3 release.
> > > There are 449 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Sat, 19 Apr 2025 17:49:48 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.14.3-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.14.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > Regressions on arm64 and s390 allmodconfig and allyesconfig builds failed
> > on the stable rc 6.14.3-rc1 with gcc-13 and clang-20.
> > 
> > There are two different types of build errors on arm64 and s390.
> > These regressions on arm64 are also found on stable-rc 6.13 and 6.12.
> > 
> > First seen on the 6.14.3-rc1
> >  Good: v6.14.2
> >  Bad:  v6.14.2-450-g0e7f2bba84c1
> > 
> > Regressions found on arm64 s390:
> >   - build/gcc-13-allmodconfig
> >   - build/gcc-13-allyesconfig
> >   - build/clang-20-allmodconfig
> >   - build/clang-20-allyesconfig
> > 
> > Regression Analysis:
> >  - New regression? Yes
> >  - Reproducibility? Yes
> > 
> > Build regression: arm64 s390 ufs-qcom.c implicit declaration
> > 'devm_of_qcom_ice_get'
> > 
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> > 
> > 
--- snip ---
> 
> > 
> > ## Build log s390
> > arch/s390/pci/pci_fixup.c: In function 'zpci_ism_bar_no_mmap':
> > arch/s390/pci/pci_fixup.c:19:13: error: 'struct pci_dev' has no member
> > named 'non_mappable_bars'
> >    19 |         pdev->non_mappable_bars = 1;
> >       |             ^~
> 
> Will go drop the offending commit now too, thanks!
> 
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

This looks like we're missing commit 888bd8322dfc ("s390/pci: Introduce
pdev->non_mappable_bars and replace VFIO_PCI_MMAP") which is a
prerequisite. I wonder if you might want that anyway to keep struct
pci_dev consistent when other backports might touch it. The original
commit aa9f168d55dc ("s390/pci: Support mmap() of PCI resources except
for ISM devices") isn't strictly a fix but it adds quirk support so
could be relevant for future backports. There is also a chance that we
may backport it for RHEL/SLES/Ubuntu in the medium term.

Thanks,
Niklas