lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250423133821.789413-4-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:33:39 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@...zon.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Ruihan Li <lrh2000@....edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>

Implement for_each_valid_pfn() based on two helper functions.

The first_valid_pfn() function largely mirrors pfn_valid(), calling into
a pfn_section_first_valid() helper which is trivial for the !VMEMMAP case,
and in the VMEMMAP case will skip to the next subsection as needed.

Since next_valid_pfn() knows that its argument *is* a valid PFN, it
doesn't need to do any checking at all while iterating over the low bits
within a (sub)section mask; the whole (sub)section is either present or
not.

Note that the VMEMMAP version of pfn_section_first_valid() may return a
value *higher* than end_pfn when skipping to the next subsection, and
first_valid_pfn() happily returns that higher value. This is fine.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/mmzone.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 230a29c2ed1a..dab1d31477d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -2075,11 +2075,37 @@ static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
 
 	return usage ? test_bit(idx, usage->subsection_map) : 0;
 }
+
+static inline bool pfn_section_first_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long *pfn)
+{
+	struct mem_section_usage *usage = READ_ONCE(ms->usage);
+	int idx = subsection_map_index(*pfn);
+	unsigned long bit;
+
+	if (!usage)
+		return false;
+
+	if (test_bit(idx, usage->subsection_map))
+		return true;
+
+	/* Find the next subsection that exists */
+	bit = find_next_bit(usage->subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION, idx);
+	if (bit == SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION)
+		return false;
+
+	*pfn = (*pfn & PAGE_SECTION_MASK) + (bit * PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION);
+	return true;
+}
 #else
 static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
 {
 	return 1;
 }
+
+static inline bool pfn_section_first_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long *pfn)
+{
+	return true;
+}
 #endif
 
 void sparse_init_early_section(int nid, struct page *map, unsigned long pnum,
@@ -2128,6 +2154,58 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
 
 	return ret;
 }
+
+/* Returns end_pfn or higher if no valid PFN remaining in range */
+static inline unsigned long first_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
+{
+	unsigned long nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
+
+	rcu_read_lock_sched();
+
+	while (nr <= __highest_present_section_nr && pfn < end_pfn) {
+		struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
+
+		if (valid_section(ms) &&
+		    (early_section(ms) || pfn_section_first_valid(ms, &pfn))) {
+			rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+			return pfn;
+		}
+
+		/* Nothing left in this section? Skip to next section */
+		nr++;
+		pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(nr);
+	}
+
+	rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+	return end_pfn;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
+{
+	pfn++;
+
+	if (pfn >= end_pfn)
+		return end_pfn;
+
+	/*
+	 * Either every PFN within the section (or subsection for VMEMMAP) is
+	 * valid, or none of them are. So there's no point repeating the check
+	 * for every PFN; only call first_valid_pfn() the first time, and when
+	 * crossing a (sub)section boundary (i.e. !(pfn & ~PFN_VALID_MASK)).
+	 */
+	if (pfn & (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) ?
+		   PAGE_SUBSECTION_MASK : PAGE_SECTION_MASK))
+		return pfn;
+
+	return first_valid_pfn(pfn, end_pfn);
+}
+
+
+#define for_each_valid_pfn(_pfn, _start_pfn, _end_pfn)			\
+	for ((_pfn) = first_valid_pfn((_start_pfn), (_end_pfn));	\
+	     (_pfn) < (_end_pfn);					\
+	     (_pfn) = next_valid_pfn((_pfn), (_end_pfn)))
+
 #endif
 
 static inline int pfn_in_present_section(unsigned long pfn)
-- 
2.49.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ