linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: mtk_wed: annotate RCU release in attach()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250423150811.456205-2-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:08:08 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: mtk_wed: annotate RCU release in attach()

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>

There are some sparse warnings in wifi, and it seems that
it's actually possible to annotate a function pointer with
__releases(), making the sparse warnings go away. In a way
that also serves as documentation that rcu_read_unlock()
must be called in the attach method, so add that annotation.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
---
 include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h
index a476648858a6..d8949a4ed0dc 100644
--- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h
+++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ struct mtk_wed_device {
 };
 
 struct mtk_wed_ops {
-	int (*attach)(struct mtk_wed_device *dev);
+	int (*attach)(struct mtk_wed_device *dev) __releases(RCU);
 	int (*tx_ring_setup)(struct mtk_wed_device *dev, int ring,
 			     void __iomem *regs, bool reset);
 	int (*rx_ring_setup)(struct mtk_wed_device *dev, int ring,
-- 
2.49.0