linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] sched/numa: Add tracepoint that tracks the skipping of numa balancing due to cpuset memory pinning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250423121219.15d5c2ec@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:12:19 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Libo Chen <libo.chen@...cle.com>
Cc: "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "mgorman@...e.de"
 <mgorman@...e.de>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
 "juri.lelli@...hat.com" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
 "vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, "tj@...nel.org"
 <tj@...nel.org>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 "llong@...hat.com" <llong@...hat.com>, "kprateek.nayak@....com"
 <kprateek.nayak@....com>, "raghavendra.kt@....com"
 <raghavendra.kt@....com>, "yu.c.chen@...el.com" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
 "tim.c.chen@...el.com" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, "vineethr@...ux.ibm.com"
 <vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>, Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@...cle.com>, Daniel
 Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes
 <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, "mkoutny@...e.com" <mkoutny@...e.com>, Dhaval
 Giani <Dhaval.Giani@....com>, "cgroups@...r.kernel.org"
 <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] sched/numa: Add tracepoint that tracks the
 skipping of numa balancing due to cpuset memory pinning

On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:05:44 +0000
Libo Chen <libo.chen@...cle.com> wrote:

> Also wondering if we can fail the build in this scenario so it will be easier to
> catch this bug at the build time.

 return -EPONYS ;-)

I wish. It's hard enough to catch this at runtime.

-- Steve