[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAkNjKIleB97r2fe@google.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:55:56 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@...il.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, dmatlack@...gle.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, joao.m.martins@...cle.com, joro@...tes.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mlevitsk@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/67] KVM: SVM: Extract SVM specific code out of get_pi_vcpu_info()
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> On 2025-04-04 at 19:38, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > @@ -876,20 +874,21 @@ int avic_pi_update_irte(struct kvm_kernel_irqfd
> > *irqfd, struct kvm *kvm,
> > * 3. APIC virtualization is disabled for the vcpu.
> > * 4. IRQ has incompatible delivery mode (SMI, INIT, etc)
> > */
> > - if (new && new->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI &&
> > - !get_pi_vcpu_info(kvm, new, &vcpu_info, &svm) &&
> > - kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&svm->vcpu)) {
> > + if (new && new && new->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI &&
>
> The `&& new` part is redundant.
Ha, good job me. Better safe than sorry? :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists