[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e01fb578-3523-4f19-8db3-e231d5daa76e@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 10:12:56 -0700
From: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
acme@...nel.org, jgross@...e.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
peterz@...radead.org, namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
wei.liu@...nel.org, ajay.kaher@...adcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
luto@...nel.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
haiyangz@...rosoft.com, decui@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 01/34] x86/msr: Move rdtsc{,_ordered}() to
<asm/tsc.h>
On 4/23/2025 7:13 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 4/22/25 01:21, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
>> Relocate rdtsc{,_ordered}() from <asm/msr.h> to <asm/tsc.h>, and
>> subsequently remove the inclusion of <asm/msr.h> in <asm/tsc.h>.
>> Consequently, <asm/msr.h> must be included in several source files
>> that previously did not require it.
>
> I know it's mildly obvious but could you please add a problem statement
> to these changelogs, even if it's just one little sentence?
So "ALWAYS make a changelog a complete story", right?
And that would be helpful for long term maintainability.
>
> For some reason, there are some TSC-related functions in the
> MSR header even though there is a tsc.h header.
>
> Relocate rdtsc{,_ordered}() and subsequently remove the
> inclusion of <asm/msr.h> in <asm/tsc.h>. Consequently,
> <asm/msr.h> must be included in several source files that
> previously did not require it.
>
> But I agree with the concept, so with this fixed:
TBH, I did hesitate to touch so many files just to include msr.h.
But because tsc.h doesn't reference any MSR definitions, it doesn't make
sense to include msr.h in tsc.h. I still did the big changes.
>
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Thank you very much!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists