linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 00/33] Refactor TI K3 R5, DSP and M4 Remoteproc Drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f18c954c-f4b6-46b5-a619-60ba23922e27@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:06:26 -0500
From: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
To: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: <afd@...com>, <hnagalla@...com>, <u-kumar1@...com>,
        <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        <jkangas@...hat.com>, <eballetbo@...hat.com>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/33] Refactor TI K3 R5, DSP and M4 Remoteproc
 Drivers

Hi Beleswar,

On 4/17/25 1:19 PM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
> This series refactors a lot of functions & callbacks from
> ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c, ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c and ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> drivers. This is a consolidated and final series as part of the
> refactoring of K3 remoteproc drivers. Below is the breakdown:
> 1. PATCHES #1-#3 fixes important bugs in R5 and DSP drivers before refactoring
> them into a common driver.
> 2. PATCHES #4-#10 does the pre-cleanup and aligns R5, DSP, M4 data structures.
> 3. PATCHES #11-#33 does the actual refactoring R5, DSP and M4 drivers into
> ti_k3_common.c driver.
> 

I noticed that for am62ax DSP, local reset is not enabled, which is an
issue, but I see that it was not enabled before your patches so it could
be a follow-up patch once these patches are merged.

Also, I have tested basic functionality on am64x EVM: 
https://gist.github.com/jmenti/9e7fb3cbb7a34fc1800092e8fa6cce87

so for the series,

Tested-by: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>