linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hfs{plus}: add deprecation warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250423042448.2045361-1-frank.li@vivo.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 22:24:48 -0600
From: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
To: slava.dubeyko@....com
Cc: brauner@...nel.org,
	djwong@...nel.org,
	dsterba@...e.cz,
	glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de,
	jack@...e.com,
	josef@...icpanda.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sandeen@...hat.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfs{plus}: add deprecation warning

Hi Slava and Adrian,

>> Please let me know if you're interested in working together on the HFS/HFS+ driver.
>> 
>
>Sounds good! Yes, I am interested in working together on the HFS/HFS+ driver. :)
>And, yes, I can consider to be the maintainer of HFS/HFS+ driver. We can
>maintain the HFS/HFS+ driver together because two maintainers are better than
>one. Especially, if there is the practical need of having HFS/HFS+ driver in
>Linux kernel.

Do you mind if there is one more person?

I used to maintain Allwinner SoC cpufreq and thermal drivers and have some work experience
in the F2FS file system.

I have a MacBook laptop and can help verify and maintain patches if needed.

Thx,
Yangtao