[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250423164655.36e53244@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:46:55 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima
<kuniyu@...zon.com>, Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, Nathan Chancellor
<nathan@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Thomas
Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] ref_tracker: don't use %pK in pr_ostream()
output
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:24:25 -0400 Jeff Layton wrote:
> - pr_ostream(s, "%s@%pK: couldn't get stats, error %pe\n",
> + pr_ostream(s, "%s@%p: couldn't get stats, error %pe\n",
FTR I think this is counter productive.
Reference tracking is a debug feature and you may want to find that
object with a debugger and inspect it. That's not the same as random
drivers printing kernel addresses into logs for not apparent reason.
Does kmemleak use the hashed address representation? It's a very
similar situation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists