[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250423165323.270642e3@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:53:23 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima
<kuniyu@...zon.com>, Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, Nathan Chancellor
<nathan@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] net: register debugfs file for net_device refcnt
tracker
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:24:31 -0400 Jeff Layton wrote:
> + /* Register debugfs file for the refcount tracker */
> + if (snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "netdev-%s@%p", dev->name, dev) < sizeof(name))
> + ref_tracker_dir_debugfs(&dev->refcnt_tracker, name);
Names are not unique and IIUC debugfs is not namespaced.
How much naming the objects in a "user readable" fashion actually
matter? It'd be less churn to create some kind of "object class"
with a directory level named after what's already passed to
ref_tracker_dir_init() and then id the objects by the pointer value
as sub-dirs of that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists