[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11d6b91a73b69924e954defe613eef7c4af45c56.camel@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 10:20:17 +0200
From: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Biao
Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>, Yinghua Pan <ot_yinghua.pan@...iatek.com>,
kernel@...labora.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: fix spinlock
recursion issues on rx/tx poll
Hi Maxime,
On Tue, 2025-04-22 at 16:00 +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Hi Louis-Alexis :)
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:03:38 +0200
> Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> > Use spin_lock_irqsave and spin_unlock_irqrestore instead of
> > spin_lock
> > and spin_unlock in mtk_star_emac driver to avoid spinlock recursion
> > occurrence that can happen when enabling the DMA interrupts again
> > in
> > rx/tx poll.
> >
> > ```
> > BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, swapper/0/0
> > lock: 0xffff00000db9cf20, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/0/0,
> > .owner_cpu: 0
> > CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
> > 6.15.0-rc2-next-20250417-00001-gf6a27738686c-dirty #28 PREEMPT
> > Hardware name: MediaTek MT8365 Open Platform EVK (DT)
> > Call trace:
> > show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C)
> > dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80
> > dump_stack+0x18/0x24
> > spin_dump+0x78/0x88
> > do_raw_spin_lock+0x11c/0x120
> > _raw_spin_lock+0x20/0x2c
> > mtk_star_handle_irq+0xc0/0x22c [mtk_star_emac]
> > __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x48/0x140
> > handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xb0
> > handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa0/0x1bc
> > handle_irq_desc+0x34/0x58
> > generic_handle_domain_irq+0x1c/0x28
> > gic_handle_irq+0x4c/0x120
> > do_interrupt_handler+0x50/0x84
> > el1_interrupt+0x34/0x68
> > el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24
> > el1h_64_irq+0x6c/0x70
> > regmap_mmio_read32le+0xc/0x20 (P)
> > _regmap_bus_reg_read+0x6c/0xac
> > _regmap_read+0x60/0xdc
> > regmap_read+0x4c/0x80
> > mtk_star_rx_poll+0x2f4/0x39c [mtk_star_emac]
> > __napi_poll+0x38/0x188
> > net_rx_action+0x164/0x2c0
> > handle_softirqs+0x100/0x244
> > __do_softirq+0x14/0x20
> > ____do_softirq+0x10/0x20
> > call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x64
> > do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x40
> > __irq_exit_rcu+0xd4/0x10c
> > irq_exit_rcu+0x10/0x1c
> > el1_interrupt+0x38/0x68
> > el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24
> > el1h_64_irq+0x6c/0x70
> > cpuidle_enter_state+0xac/0x320 (P)
> > cpuidle_enter+0x38/0x50
> > do_idle+0x1e4/0x260
> > cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x3c
> > rest_init+0xdc/0xe0
> > console_on_rootfs+0x0/0x6c
> > __primary_switched+0x88/0x90
> > ```
> >
> > Fixes: 0a8bd81fd6aa ("net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: separate tx/rx
> > handling with two NAPIs")
> > Signed-off-by: Louis-Alexis Eyraud
> > <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>
>
> As this is a fix, you need to indicate in your subject that you're
> targetting the "net" tree, something like :
>
> [PATCH net 1/2] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: fix spinlock recursion
> issues on rx/tx poll
>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c
> > index
> > 76f202d7f05537642ec294811ace2ad4a7eae383..41d6af31027f4d827dbfdfecd
> > b7de44326bb3de1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c
> > @@ -1163,6 +1163,7 @@ static int mtk_star_tx_poll(struct
> > napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> > struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev;
> > unsigned int head = ring->head;
> > unsigned int entry = ring->tail;
> > + unsigned long flags = 0;
>
> You don't need to init flags to 0
>
> >
> > while (entry != head && count < (MTK_STAR_RING_NUM_DESCS -
> > 1)) {
> > ret = mtk_star_tx_complete_one(priv);
> > @@ -1182,9 +1183,9 @@ static int mtk_star_tx_poll(struct
> > napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> > netif_wake_queue(ndev);
> >
> > if (napi_complete(napi)) {
> > - spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > mtk_star_enable_dma_irq(priv, false, true);
> > - spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -1342,15 +1343,16 @@ static int mtk_star_rx_poll(struct
> > napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> > {
> > struct mtk_star_priv *priv;
> > int work_done = 0;
> > + unsigned long flags = 0;
>
> There's a rule in netdev that definitions must be ordered from
> longest
> to shortest lines (reverse xmas tree, or RCT), so you should have in
> the end :
>
> struct mtk_star_priv *priv;
> unsigned long flags;
> int work_done = 0;
>
> >
> > priv = container_of(napi, struct mtk_star_priv, rx_napi);
> >
> > work_done = mtk_star_rx(priv, budget);
> > if (work_done < budget) {
> > napi_complete_done(napi, work_done);
> > - spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > mtk_star_enable_dma_irq(priv, true, false);
> > - spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > return work_done;
> >
>
> Besides these small comments, the patch looks correct to me :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Maxime
Thanks for the review, Maxime.
I'll add the missing subject prefix and fix the other issues in the v2
patchset.
Regards,
Louis-Alexis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists